Difference between Synchronous and Asynchronous Counter: In digital electronics, a counter is a sequential logic circuit that comprises a series of flip-flops. Counters are utilized to tally the number of occurrences of an input in terms of negative or positive edge transitions.
What is a Synchronous Counter?
A Synchronous Counter is a counter where the “clock” pulses are simultaneously applied to all the flip-flops. This type of counter is also referred to as a parallel counter.
In a synchronous counter, the flip-flops are arranged in a cascade connection, and each flip-flop is connected to the same external clock signal. This arrangement enables the clocking of all the flip-flops at the same time with the same clock input. Consequently, the output of each flip-flop changes in synchronization with the clock input.
As a result, the simultaneous clock signal causes the state change in each individual flip-flop, without any ripple effect or propagation delay in a synchronous counter. Logic gates are employed in synchronous counters to control the count sequence.
What is an Asynchronous Counter?
An Asynchronous Counter, also known as a serial counter, consists of flip-flops connected in series, with the clock pulse provided to the first flip-flop in the connection.
The output of the first flip-flop serves as the input for the next adjacent flip-flop in the forward direction, resulting in the clock input rippling through the counter. Consequently, these counters are also called ripple-counters. The ripple effect leads to a delay in the timing signal as it passes through each flip-flop, resulting in a propagation delay.
Difference between Synchronous and Asynchronous Counters
Here are the key differences between Synchronous and Asynchronous Counters:
- All the constituent flip-flops are triggered simultaneously with the same clock.
- Operates at a faster speed compared to an asynchronous counter.
- Less error-prone as each flip-flop is individually clocked.
- Design and implementation are more complex.
- Can be operated in any desired count sequence by manipulating the clock sequence.
- No propagation delay was observed.
- Different flip-flops are triggered with different clocks.
- Operates at a relatively slower speed compared to a synchronous counter.
- More error-prone, leading to decoding errors in the system.
- Design and implementation are relatively simpler.
- Operates only in a fixed count sequence, i.e., UP and DOWN.
- The subsequent propagation delay from one flip-flop to another.
In conclusion, a synchronous counter clocks all its flip-flops simultaneously with the same clock input, while an asynchronous counter clocks the constituent flip-flops with different signals at different time instants.
|Analog and Memory Layout Design Forum|
|Physical Layout Design Forum|
|RTL & Verilog Design Forum|
|Analog Layout Design Interview Questions||Memory Design Interview Questions|
|Physical Design Interview Questions||Verilog Interview Questions|
|Digital Design Interview Questions||STA Interview Questions|